Press review of April 17th 2018

revue de presse du 17 avril 2018

Here is a little overview of articles that caught my attention and deserve to appear in the press review of April 17, 2018!

Subaru offers 3 years of insurance

Links: DecisionAtelier.com – Subaru offers 3 years insurance.

Those who read me regularly know that I often talk about a decomposition of the value chain to come. Indeed, I believe that it will be necessary tomorrow for insurers to go further in their response to the needs of their policyholders at the risk of being supplanted in the commercial relationship. The example above is symbolic for me of this situation! Subaru, automaker, intermediates the insurer in the proposal of a motor insurance. This is obviously not new, but it raises again the question of the role that can play the trademark of the insurer in this if it no longer assumes the distribution to the client.

The blockchain is dead, live Hashgraph

Links: Article from Journal the net – Hashgraph .
When it comes to blockchain, it happens quite quickly that we fall back on the technical difficulties of scalability and performance. A new technological solution would make it possible to overcome a number of these constraints. The proposal seems interesting and the subject promising, but we are obviously still far from a concrete applicability. All you have to do now is read white paper to get an idea ( Note: I have not read it yet! )

When call centers predict customer emotions

Link: ZDNet – When call centers predict customer emotions

There is a lot of talk about affective computing or how artificial intelligence could move us on the path of emotional intelligence. However, so far, few reliable sources allow to see more clearly what happens. We knew the solution of Affectiva , we can now add Cogito. This solution is based on sociometers, developed by an MIT team. It’s about detecting subtle signals in speech, tone and body language, regardless of the words used.

Solar panels, a puzzle for firefighters

Link: XLCatlin- Solar Panels

Innovation in insurance is not only new technologies that come to transform the business, they are also new risks . We talk about cyber risk very often, but here’s another, quite unexpected, but still difficult to manage.

Make car insurance “cool”?

Link: Karl Heinz Passler – My 10 innovative ideas on making motor insurance cool

Karl Heinz Passler is one of the leading influencers in the insurance innovation market. He is very active on the social networks , and a little less frequently on his blog, but the article above presents some often simple ideas for boosting car insurance!

UBS Insurtech Shifting Asia report sept. 2017

UBS insurtech shifting asia

In late 2017, the Chief Investment Officer of UBS published a report “ UBS insurtech Shifting Asia ” (Original landing page here). I propose here a statement of key points, and what to remember.

Key points to remember about UBS insurtech Shifting Asia

  • Asia is one of the least insurance-covered markets and there are huge catch-up prospects
  • Insurtechs have the opportunity to transform this market more than any other. They could generate, for example, up to $ 300 billion in savings by 2025.
  • Competition is tough on the continent and forces to improve the quality of service as well as to find differentiation criteria
  • Customers are going to be the big winners of the arrival of insurtechs.
  • Incentive prevention actions could lead to significant effects on risky portfolios and thus significant improvements for the benefit of society.

Continue reading “UBS Insurtech Shifting Asia report sept. 2017”

25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

Oxbow Partners is a UK-based consulting firm dedicated to the world of insurance. More specifically, they are specialized in topics that are changing the world of insurance, through 3 entry points: strategy, digital, and M&A. They just released a report called “ The 25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018 ” .

Introduction

I share the point of departure of Oxbow Partners, according to which there is no reliable criterion of comparison of insurtechs currently.

Some are interested in raised funds. However, I think financially speaking, raising money is not necessarily a positive criterion for a startup. Indeed, if it is necessary to pass caps, it can mean that it can not finance its growth alone.

I decided to classify them according to their contribution to the business value chain, but it is just as debatable because I do not take into account their economic sustainability.

In short, Oxbow Partners made its selection according to the following criteria:

25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

In addition, they take up a concept now commonly accepted: insurtechs today are not only distributors (B2C), but are facilitators or accelerators in B2B.

Last interesting element, represented under the diagram below, they consider that after the abandonment of a phase of competition, in favor of the collaboration between big groups and insurtechs, one should see reappearing soon a competition of another kind . This could be explained, according to Oxbow Partners, in the event of insufficient commitment by insurers. 25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

Selection of 25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

The selected startups belong to 4 categories:

  • Distribution: These players are looking for end customers and need insurers or reinsurers to provide them with products
  • Data & analytics
  • Operations
  • Claims and fraud

These last 3 categories are actors who need insurers as clients.

Here is the selection presented differently.
25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018 25 insurtechs Oxbow 2018

The last pages of the report present a summary in 1 or 2 pages for each of the selected solutions.

Landscape insurtechs – February 23rd, 2018

landscape insurtechs

The update of my landscape insurtechs goes on with 14 additions on February 23rd, 2018. You’ll find the update here. There are now 150 startups documented, from 21 countries.

Additions to the landscape insurtechs on February 23rd, 2018

Newcomers today:

  • RiskGenius: Using artificial intelligence to better categorize the content of insurance policies, ensure a better reading and facilitate underwriting operations.
  • Go Bear: Price and quality insurance product comparison engine, enriched with a scoring system.
  • Codeoscopic: Provider of digital solutions dedicated to the insurance business, Multi-pricing motor, Risk manager dedicated to Solvency 2.
  • Gistek Insurance solutions: Set of software solutions to facilitate the management of insurance contracts or claims, Automation of processes.
  • Numen: Provider of digital solutions dedicated to the improvement of the insurance process and the management of the triangles of claims.
  • Satisfi: Exploit customer data to automatically make recommendations through automation, artificial intelligence and robots..
  • Captricity: Exploitation of the data to increase sales, reduce processing cycles or offer quick subscriptions without losses on the quality of risk analysis.
  • Ideeo: Brokerage of insurance contracts, Compensation defined with the applicant.
  • Addon-ACS: Behavioral analysis in real time of the consumers, during the course of care, Prevention, Improvement of the course of care via a scoring of the practices.
  • Aukazou: Damage management Water damage on behalf of the insured.
  • Assurup: Insurance dedicated to the specific needs of startups.
  • Wizzas: Co-design of customized insurance products to cover the needs of communities, Community building, Search for insurers to bear the risks.
  • Guard Time: Blockchain solutions to limit fraud and improve trust and automation of decisions.
  • Boundlss: Using chatbot and artificial intelligence to encourage improvement of lifestyle behaviors, Increased engagement with policyholders.

Contact me if you still don’t appear in the landscape insurtechs!

Matteo Carbone – 4P’s of insurtechs

4P's of insurtechs

Matteo Carbone is an opinion leader in the insurtech industry today as one of the most prominent on the market. He created the Connected Insurance Observatory, an international working group, first in Europe, then in North America, dedicated to insurtechs. Matteo participates in numerous conferences around the world throughout the year. He unfolds his theory of 4P’s of insurtechs, and I wanted to make a presentation for a long time.

The 4P’s of insurtechs

First of all, you can listen to Matteo Carbone in his presentation at the 2017 Global Insurance Symposium in Des Moines.

You can also find slides at this link, if you are an aficionado of his prose, without listening to his wonderful English accent!

Key points to remember

According to Matteo Carbone, insurtechs can intervene on 4 axes:

  • Productivity : be more efficient
  • Profitability : get a better technical result
  • Proximity : to be closer to the customer and his needs
  • Sustainability of the portfolio (the term it uses is “Persistency” which means persistence over time, and therefore no attrition): Build a profitable portfolio on the long run term, with a small rotation.

In the absence of these objectives, there is no interest in innovating because the solution will not bring anything useful.

Telematics

The second subject addressed in this presentation is telematics, because it is one of the key topics of Matteo Carbone. The Swiss Re report which I was echoing a few months ago is directly worked with him, when it comes to the Italian example.

3 topics to consider:

  • The connected object : often a black box connected to the vehicle
  • Insurance coverage : and the notion of incentive reduction associated with it
  • Associated services : access to a set of additional services that can be provided for a fixed fee.

Under the arguments that telematics allows of itself and of course a selection of the best risks ( Note: it is questionable ) and a better controls of the compensations ( Note: that on the other hand, I share ), he comes to the conclusion that the financial result of the insurer is improved thanks to this technology.

4P's of insurtechs

It is also possible to rework the customer experience on all of its use of the vehicle and the different needs that might be relevant. Note: this aspect is absolutely essential, because it is from the use that one deduces the exploitation that one can make technologies.

4P's of insurtechs

Finally, the figures it presents show that attrition will be lower with telematics than without (11% instead of 14%).

In short, that positive points!

My conclusion

I share a lot of Matteo’s conclusions.

By reading, you will understand that the questions of use and business need interest me first. The 4P’s of insurtechs are a key to reading that is interesting to keep in the lead.

On the Telematics side, I am also convinced of the short / medium term prospects for the subject. I invite you to read again my note on it . Let’s discuss if you want to consider a deployment!

Gras Savoye – Insurance Markets 2018

marchés de l'assurance 2018

The broker Gras Savoye, belonging to the Willis Towers Watson Group, published in september 2017 an interesting economic note on the transformation of the insurance markets 2018. They come back therefore, by business line, on current trends.

Overview

Overall, the French insurance market is rather stable:

  • The world market is down slightly
  • France remains an important market (5th world player), with just over 200 billion euros of premiums
  • Personal insurance accounts for 75% of this figure, and sees a rise in pension premiums
  • Property insurance is subject to strong competition, and is experiencing a significant increase in claims, which affects the underwriting results. This is due in particular to climatic events.

In the details of the 2018 insurance markets

In brief

Given the richness of the report, it is complicated to synthesize it, and I prefer to suggest that you refer to it if necessary. I prefer to present the plan!

insurance markets 2018 insurance markets 2018

Each theme is treated according to 5 axes:

  • Capacity / Appetite
  • Price
  • Deductibles
  • Warranties
  • Flexibility

Some key things to remember

  • 3 alternatives to risk transfer are presented:
    • Structured Insurance: covering the multi-year consequences of new or complex risks. (terrorism, pandemics, strikes, etc.)
    • parametric insurance : or index-based insurance, which i have already talked a lot here
    • Mutli-line / Multi-year approach: which reduces volatility
  • D&O (Executive) policies continue to evolve and adapt to changing risks. The tailor-made is put on this profitable and dynamic market (new regulations, cyber risks, etc. which increase the risks for managers).
  • There is growing interest in combined fraud / cyber collateral, although these mounts do not always yield the best proposals. Note: It is understandable that customers are always looking to hedge against an unknown risk, but perceived as critical .
  • Kidnap & Ransom products are in full swing, because of an international geopolitical context that is sometimes hazardous.

Conclusion: My opinion

This report is a mine of information, very technical, but essential to a good understanding of the complexity of heavy risks. A disadvantage on the bedside table, but imperatively under the elbow!

In hollow, one sees there appear, as often, the insurance products which could be generalized tomorrow. The trends observed, especially on cyber, fraud or regulatory aspects are in this sense good indicators of the future.

Press review January 15th, 2018

revue de presse du 17 avril 2018

Here is a little overview of articles that caught my attention and deserve to appear in the “press review January 15th, 2018”!

O’Reilly offers books on data and artificial intelligence

The famous publisher of computer science books has a library of 80 of its publications on big data, artificial intelligence and data science, published between 2012 and 2016. Essential detail: the download is free, in pdf, epub or mobi.

Remember: when it’s free, you’re the product! O’reilly asks for your name, first name and email to download, but nothing forces you to enter the real …

press review January 15th, 2018

Not so accidental road accidents

Mathieu Grossetête is a researcher at the university research center on public action and politics. We propose in the Diplomatic World a reading interestingly, accidentology by car.

It appears that the prevention policies of Road Safety may now reach their limits because they are poorly targeted! Or when the art of data analysis becomes essential to better control a phenomenon, and treat it correctly!

Exciting article to read, which makes us rethink the notion of risk analysis, the perception of events. Finally, it simply invites us to change our way of thinking.

press review January 15th, 2018

Typologies of wearables

Evan Kirstel, one of the leading thought leaders in connected health, offers us a panorama of typologies of connected objects for health, aka wearables. This one goes a little further than the usual dichotomy watch and bracelet vs balance!

press review January 15th, 2018

Deloitte: human collaboration – machines

A visual of a Deloitte study, found on Twitter, gives an interesting reading of the symbiotic relationship that can develop between humans and machines. All thanks to the service rendered!

press review January 15th, 2018

Axa and telemedicine

Jacques de Peretti, CeO of Axa in France announced this week the launch of telemedicine in companies and openness from service to experts.

The second service is the extension of the current service (which I had the opportunity to test personally and which is very good). On the other hand, the first one supposes major investments and questions around the model chosen by Axa.

The question of danger, posed by Olivier Harmant, is in my opinion not relevant.

press review January 15th, 2018

However, what is the return on investment of this model for a complementary insurer? Indeed, a teleconsultation at the expense of the complementary supposes a cost support higher than the usual part. In order to be financially attractive, such a service needs to be either cheaper than normal consultation or to reduce risks. For now, teleconsultation is a vector of brand image and carries a demarcation line with respect to the competition. However, when everyone will do it, it will be necessary to consider the business model that goes with it!

Finally, should not this be the role of an intermediary platform? The latter would make this service available and look for the insurer who answers it. On the contrary here, it is carried directly by a complementary insurance? What does this say about our public health insurance? A lot of questions, few answers for now!